SPACs are an alternative to the traditional way businesses raise money known as initial public offerings (IPOs). Since January 1, 2021 SPACs have raised over $88 billion, making up 83 percent of public offerings this year and raising more money than they did in all of 2020.

As investment banks and professional investors celebrate this booming market, regulators worry that the excitement around SPACs has created a dangerous bubble. Without better protections, everyday retail investors may be in trouble if the bubble bursts.

SPACs are shell companies that list themselves on public stock exchanges. Their sponsors collect money from investors and use it to acquire private businesses that plan to go public. After the acquisition, the acquired company replaces the SPAC on the stock exchange and the investors receive shares in the company. If a SPAC does not acquire a company within two years, the sponsors must give investors their money back.

SPACs originated in the 1990s. At the time, they were associated with fraudulent penny stock companies. But SPACs have reemerged in recent years as a legitimate investment tool due in large part to the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic encouraged companies to conduct public offerings quickly to take advantage of low interest rates and excess savings. At the same time, the pandemic has made IPOs difficult to execute because they require business owners to travel to meet with investors, and their prices are susceptible to market instability.

By conducting public offerings through SPACs, companies can address these problems. SPACs eliminate the need for extensive travel because business owners can negotiate exclusively with the SPAC’s sponsors, rather than with each investor. SPAC acquisitions take only 5 months on average, compared to 12 to 18 months for IPOs. And they protect companies from the pandemic-related market instability by setting the share price behind closed doors with no input from short-term traders.

In the past year, SPACs helped many companies go public and made some professional investors very rich.

But they are risky. In the past five years, SPACs lost an average of 9.6 percent, compared to an average gain of 47.1 percent for IPOs. This trend remained constant in 2020.

Regulators worry that vulnerable retail investors—encouraged by low interest rates and commission-free lending—will invest in SPACs without understanding the risks.

Acting U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Allison Herren Lee claims that SPACs often fail to deliver for investors because their sponsors have misaligned incentives. SPACs typically compensate their sponsors with the option to purchase 20 percent of the SPAC’s stock at a substantial discount and quickly resell it at the market price. This compensation structure gives sponsors an incentive to make sure the SPAC acquires a company, even if the company is not worth the price the SPAC pays for it. During an IPO, investors are protected from this conflict of interest because managers cannot sell their stock until months later.

Former SEC Chair Jay Clayton argues that investors should be free to invest their money in SPACs as long as sponsors properly disclose their incentives and conflicts. To help investors obtain better information about a SPAC’s sponsor, the SEC issued guidance in December 2020 encouraging sponsors to disclose their compensation incentives and conflicts of interest.

Some critics argue that increased disclosure from sponsors is not enough to protect SPAC investors. Information that SPACs provide to investors is not as reliable as information that companies provide when conducting IPOs. When companies initiate an IPO, they hire investment banks to review their disclosures. These banks review disclosure documents thoroughly because they are liable for any errors. SPACs, however, do not need to have any third party review their disclosures before an acquisition, making SPACs more likely to provide investors with fraudulent or misleading disclosures.

Another problem with relying on disclosures to protect investors from SPACs is that SPACs can entice investors with baseless financial projections in their disclosures. Federal law allows publicly traded companies to provide investors with financial projections. Companies conducting IPOs are not allowed to share these projections with investors because they are not yet public. SPACs, however, can use financial projections to solicit investors because SPACs are registered with the SEC as public companies. Current law allows SPACs to project unrealistically high returns for an acquisition with little chance of getting in trouble. Retail investors are especially susceptible to baseless financial projections because they are less likely to conduct their own financial analysis.

Some commentators argue that the SEC should do more to protect retail investors by helping them understand the risks associated with SPACs. For example, the SEC could require SPAC sponsors to include information about their ownership stake and their decision-making process in any press release or other public communication they issue following an acquisition. This would particularly benefit retail investors, who are more likely to understand a press release than complex financial disclosures. The SEC could also mandate that investment brokers inform their customers of the risks from investing in SPACs before helping customers purchase SPAC shares.

Another way the SEC could regulate SPACs is to require their sponsors to obtain approval from an independent committee of directors and a third-party pricing expert for each acquisition. This would prevent sponsors from completing acquisitions that only benefit themselves.

Finally, the SEC could use its influence over the market to discourage SPACs from engaging in fraudulent or excessively risky behavior. Senior officials at the SEC could make public statements criticizing activities the SEC wants to discourage. SEC staff could intentionally slow the approval process when SPACs register as public companies. And the staff could ask SPAC sponsors more detailed and difficult questions when reviewing their disclosures. Supporters of these proposals claim that a commission-wide shift in attitude toward SPACs could temper the SPAC market and discourage nefarious actors from moving forward with their venture.

With proper oversight, SPACs can continue to provide companies with a fast and effective alternative to IPOs. Without such oversight, retail investors may end up paying the price.

The post Wall Street’s Favorite Four-Letter Word appeared first on Investor News.

Bumble Inc, a dating app operator backed by buyout firm Blackstone Group Inc, sold shares in its initial public offering (IPO) on Wednesday at $43 apiece above its target range, to raise $2.2 billion.

The IPO gave the Austin, Texas-based company a market capitalization of more than $7 billion. Bumble sold 50 million shares after raising its share offering several times, previously aiming to sell 45 million shares at a target price range of $37 to $39.

Some dating apps like Bumble have flourished even under COVID-19-related social distancing, as people who stay at home turn to instant messaging to seek romance.

Bumble, which also owns the Badoo dating app, said it expects to record up to $541.5 million in revenue between January and December 2020, up 11% from the prior year driven by growth in paying customers.

The company had 42 million monthly active users as of the end of September, out of which 2.5 million were paying users, up 22% from the prior year. It had $900 million in debt.

Bumble, whose eponymous dating app allows women to initiate introductions, was founded in 2014 by Whitney Wolfe Herd after an acrimonious departure from rival app Tinder, which she had co-founded.

Wolfe Herd, 31, had sued Tinder alleging that her co-founders subjected her to sexual harassment. Tinder parent Match Group Inc, which denied the allegations, paid about $1 million to settle the dispute.

A court fight, however, broke out in 2018 after Bumble rejected a $450 million acquisition offer from Match. Match had filed a lawsuit against Bumble alleging intellectual property infringement. But Bumble counter-sued two weeks later accusing Match of fraud and trade secrets theft. Both lawsuits were later dropped that same year.

In 2019, Blackstone paid about $3 billion to acquire majority stake in MagicLab, which owned the Bumble and Badoo apps at the time, from founder Andrey Andreev. Wolfe Herd was named Bumble’s chief executive officer after the deal.

Bumble’s shares are due to begin trading on the Nasdaq under the symbol “BMBL.” Goldman Sachs and Citigroup are the lead underwriters for the offering.

Reporting by Chibuike Oguh in New York; Editing by Aurora Ellis.

The post Bumble Raises $2.15 Billion in IPO appeared first on Investor News.

DoorDash Inc mentioned on Monday it’s aiming to boost as much as $2.8 billion in an preliminary public providing (IPO), which might double the worth of the U.S. meals supply startup and be one among 2020’s largest public market debuts.

DoorDash, the most important U.S. third-party supply firm for eating places, plans to promote 33 million shares priced between $75 and $85 apiece, it mentioned in a regulatory submitting.

On the high of its goal vary, the IPO would give DoorDash a totally diluted valuation – which incorporates securities reminiscent of choices and restricted inventory models – of $31.96 billion, almost double the $16 billion DoorDash was value in a June personal fundraising spherical. DoorDash’s market capitalization at $85 per share would complete $27 billion.

The hefty leap in DoorDash’s valuation in a matter of months underscores the elevated demand for meal supply providers in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to anticipation of continued investor demand for brand new shares which promise progress.

Firms have raised over $140 billion in the USA up to now in 2020, making it the most important 12 months ever for IPOs, in accordance with knowledge from Dealogic.

Based in 2013, DoorDash is backed by the Imaginative and prescient Fund managed by Japan tech big SoftBank Group Corp, enterprise capital agency Sequoia Capital, and the Authorities of Singapore Funding Company (GIC), Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund.

DoorDash and rivals Uber Eats, Grubhub Inc and Postmates Inc have benefited from a surge in demand for meals supply providers on account of widespread COVID-19 restrictions.

The corporate posted a surge in income progress in 2020 and its first quarterly revenue, it disclosed in its IPO submitting earlier this month.

A variety of large Silicon Valley names together with Palantir Applied sciences Inc , Snowflake Inc and Unity Software program Inc have gone public this 12 months, using on a inventory market rally within the second half of the 12 months fueled by stimulus cash and hopes of an efficient vaccine to finish the pandemic.

DoorDash’s IPO and a deliberate itemizing by house rental startup Airbnb Inc are set to make December a busy interval for IPOs not like in earlier years and mark a powerful end to a blockbuster 12 months for brand new listings.

San Francisco-based DoorDash plans to drift its shares on the New York Inventory Alternate beneath the ticker ‘DASH’ on Dec. 9. It had confidentially filed for an IPO in February.

Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan are the lead underwriters for the providing.

The post DoorDash Seeking Up to $2.8 Billion in IPO at Potential $32 Billion Valuation appeared first on Investor News.

Move over, IPOs, SPACs are becoming more popular.

Special-purpose acquisition companies, once a last resort for owners looking to exit an investment, have become a popular choice for private companies spooked by the swings in the regular IPO market. The volume of SPAC deals hit an all-time high in 2019.

Instead of a regular initial public offering that would raise funds through a share sale, a small but growing number of IPO candidates are choosing to sell themselves to SPACs instead.

Draftkings SPAC deal

DraftKings Inc. is the latest example. The sportsbook operator agreed to sell to Diamond Eagle Acquisition Corp., along with gaming technology firm SBTech, in $3.3-billion deal on Monday. By merging with a SPAC, DraftKings still goes public, but it’s through a reverse merger, or a so-called backdoor listing.

Having well-known backers such as blue-chip private equity firms and former public company CEOs involved also has rehabbed the image of SPACs, or blank-check companies that raise money for acquisitions.

It didn’t hurt that billionaire Richard Branson did a SPAC deal too. Still, Branson’s space company, Virgin Galactic Holdings Inc., which went public after merging with a Silicon Valley-based SPAC, is trading lower than where its shares debuted in October.

One of the largest companies to do a SPAC deal after exploring an IPO is Blackstone-owned Vivint. Blackstone had explored an IPO or sale of the technology company and ended up merging it with a SPAC raised by SoftBank’s Fortress Investment Group, in a deal valued at $5.6 billion including debt.

Merging with a SPAC can save a listing candidate months or even a year compared with a regular IPO, said Ryan Maierson, partner at law firm Latham & Watkins.

Uber IPO failed to hit targets

The lackluster showings of ride-hailing companies Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. that hurt the IPO market in 2019 have played a big role in the resurrection of SPACs.

IPO is not the only option

“We have a downdraft in IPO activity recently, and SPACs that are looking for a target would be a good fit for companies looking to go public that aren’t finding investors in the IPO market,” Maierson said.

Blank-check companies were created in the 1980s and were associated with fraudulent activity and penny stocks, which gave them a bad reputation. They now have stricter rules.

SPAC is an increasing popular alternative to IPO

SPACs have raised $13.5 billion in the U.S. this year so far, the most on record and surpassing 2007’s $11.7-billion total, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. These firms announced $24.6 billion of acquisitions this year, another record.

Goksu Yolac, JP Morgan’s head of SPACs, estimates there is nearly $19 billion of capital raised via SPACs “that is waiting to be deployed via M&A.”

Private equity firms also like buying companies through SPACs to pay down the target’s debt quicker, said Thomas H. Lee Partners co-President Scott Sperling. The firm bought a healthcare technology company called Universal Hospital Services Inc. in January and renamed it Agiliti.

“It makes for a less risky transaction by de-levering with the SPAC capital,” Sperling said.

The average size of a SPAC raised this year is more than $230 million, compared with about $180 million in 2016, the data showed.

To be sure, SPAC listings come with risks. Target companies often give up more control and economics when they sell to a SPAC, which has its own operating team in place. They’re also subject to a vote by the SPAC shareholders. Sometimes this can lead to deals being scrapped before they can close.

The parent company of CEC Entertainment Inc., which runs Chuck E. Cheese and Peter Piper Pizza, canceled a $1.4-billion merger with a Lion Capital-backed SPAC in July, three months after it was announced.

SPACs continue to attract high-profile dealmakers

Still, SPACs continue to attract high-profile dealmakers. Michael Klein, a veteran banker who founded boutique investment bank M. Klein and Co., raised $690 million via Churchill Capital Corp II, the biggest deal of its type this year. Churchill has held talks to buy Spanish-language broadcaster Univision Communications, people familiar with the matter have said.

Big names such as TPG Capital, Apollo Global Management and the investment bank Centerview all have SPACs now.

“You have very high-profile SPAC issuers in the current times versus pre-crisis when it was lesser known sponsors for the most part,” said Paul Abrahimzadeh, co-head of equity capital markets for North America at Citigroup Inc, the fourth-largest SPAC arranger this year. “They’ve become more mainstream.”

The post SPAC deals now are rehabbed and swapped for failed IPOs appeared first on Investor News.

The most anticipated IPO in many years is set for this month, but is the Uber unicorn a real fairy tale.  The price for the UBER ticker symbol is set between $44 to $50 for its public debut on May 10^th.

1. Lyft IPO should be a warning.

Lyft, the rideshare company and Ubers main competitor in the US went public and  Lyft stock slid 20% in a matter of days. Lyft is by all accounts a stronger, faster growing company than Uber.

2. Uber has slow growth

Uber’s profitability, slowing growth and limited financial disclosures are just a few reasons why this once Mammoth company is now not getting the investor love it once had. Silicon Valley has seen enough Snapchats to know when it’s time to hang up your hat on over-valued stock.

3. Uber Drivers will leave in masses after IPO

Uber will start to limit incentives for drivers as soon as it goes public to help boost profits. As many of their contracted drivers see perks go down they will switch to driving with the more contractor friendly Lyft. Uber has evaded treating drivers as employees, which leaves their drivers free to drop the company and switch to Lyft.

Uber will find it will be difficult to keep many new drivers when more share of their earnings with less benefits will be handed to the parent company who treats drivers like the  black sheep of the family instead of bread winners.

Uber’s attempt to squeeze drivers in 2017, along with a series of PR disasters that led to the #DeleteUber campaign, drove both riders and drivers to other platforms, like Lyft. According to data firm Second Measure, Uber’s share of the U.S. rideshare market declined from 82% at the beginning of 2017 to 71% at the end of the year.

4. Uber Legal Troubles

Uber was a thorn in the side for regulators in many countries and has a history of less than honorable behavior. The company had its fair share of negative press, and has snubbed its nose at many regulators for years. Uber has been banned in cities and states throughout the US, Europe and Asia. Uber is landmine and even with an IPO, the company will have an uphill battle to fix its legal and regulatory issues in many countries.

Companies like Bolt in Europe have shown that it’s possible to operate a ridesharing app profitably, but you can’t do so while simultaneously trying to achieve a dominant market share worldwide. Uber can be a huge company, or it can be a profitable company, but it can’t be both.

5. Ubers numbers don’t add up

Uber believes that it is unstoppable and their claim that they will  control 15% of the global economy is at best insane. The company prospectus looks more like a pennystock pump and dump than a serious reflection of the companys true potential and current economic situation.

6. Uber regime changes

Many of the original members of Uber have moved on or been thrown out. The CEO and Founder Travis Kalanick along with CFO and the team that heralded Ubers initial success have all moved on or been kicked out, leaving seasoned Silicon Veterans to hold the store.

The post Uber’s IPO 6 Reasons Its Numbers Don’t Add Up appeared first on Investor News.

The basket of social media stocks will expand Thursday as Pinterest, Inc. joins the ranks of Facebook, Inc. SnapChat and others.

Pinterest will issue 75 million shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “PINS,” according to the firm’s S-1 filing.

At prices between $15 and $17, the offering represents 100 percent of outstanding shares and is expected to bring in about $1.466 billion. Editor’s note: Pinterest priced a 75-million share offering at $19 per share.

The lead underwriters include Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Allen & Company.

The company qualifies as an emerging growth company under the U.S. JOBS Act, which exempts management from certain SEC disclosure requirements.

Pinterest The Company

Pinterest operates a social media platform that includes a customized discovery board and visual blog. The site enables visitors to search and discover lifestyle inspiration.

“[Users] come to discover ideas for just about anything you can imagine: daily activities like cooking dinner or deciding what to wear, major commitments like remodeling a house or training for a marathon, ongoing passions like fly fishing or fashion and milestone events like planning a wedding or a dream vacation,” the San Francisco-based company said in the SEC filing.

Visitors organize their interests on curated boards to better visualize their goals. “Pinterest is the productivity tool for planning your dreams,” the prospectus said.

At the end of 2018, the firm recorded more than 250 million monthly active users contributing a monthly average of 2 billion searches.

By helping build brand awareness and improve online traffic for e-commerce, Pinterest considers itself a well-positioned advertiser. It estimates the global digital advertising market will grow from $272 billion in 2018 to $423 billion in 2022.

The Finances

In 2018, Pinterest recorded $755.93 million in revenue contributing to a net loss of $62.97 million. The previous year saw a loss of $130.04 million on revenue of $472.85 million.

The post Pinterest IPO What Worth Knowing appeared first on Investor News.